For All Wwe Marks +bq?
wake up, smell the daisys, and realise that TNA > WWE. Vince mcmahon has brainwashed the 5million kids into watching RAW(Tastless) each week… its the same boring crap, 3 matches at the most… and guest hosts who know nothing about wrestling, and the bella Ho’s & hornswoggle are a disgrace
RAW makes the teletubbies look like a MA15 show.
cross the line to TNA and watch real talent wrestle, and not a supertool(cena) and a oiled up ranga pull off the same ending each week
TNA TNA TNA
BQ: r u happy that bourne can make the MITB match look twice as exciting

To Darren the guy who answered, The reason they couldn’t hack it
in WWE is because they didn’t kiss Vince’s *** or HHH’s *** that’s
why so many good wrestlers and Good female wrestlers are getting
buried losing to people who can’t wrestle, The guys getting pushes
are Shaemus, Cena, Batista, Miz are you freakin kidding me, meanwhile
Bryan danielson, Chistian, Gail Kim, Chavo Guerrero, Evan Bourne etc..
are all getting treated like garbage, so they go to TNA, where they push
people based on wrestling skills, not kissing ***, Although I don’t like
Nasty Boys and Bubba who kiss Hogans *** being in TNA.
Yeah, WWE is a disgrace, no doubt about it. But to say TNA is better when it is littered with old farts who can barely walk while talent like Samoa Joe and Christopher Daniels goes misused, is like saying eating crap is better than eating cold pizza. It doen’t make sense my friend. You need to recognize that TNA is just as bad, especially with idiots like Bischoff, Hogan, Dixie, and Russo making decisions. TNA 1.0 rating: WWE 3.4 rating. It doesn’t matter what you or me thinks, it matters what the public thinks and like me they recognize that the WWE does suck, but TNA is even worse.
Yeah TNA is so great that they pulled a 1.0 in ratings Monday night! They had less wrestling this past week than WWE did. While WWE pulled in a 3.4 ratings. TNA is still no where close to beating WWE. ANd the longer Hogan is in TNA the more the ratings will go down.
Are you smoking crack wwe shits all over Tna i mean look at your roster all ex wwe stars that couldnt hack wwe or even get a place on the ECW ROSTER. I argree that the bella sluts and honswogole are **** but there still more talented then the TNA stars
For all TNA marks TNA got a 1.0 so I have got two words for ya ***** Off
TNA is way better then WWE right now since they have Rob Van Dam
I agree. it’s been alot better forawhile now. now that they’ve added hogan. it’s only a matter of time folks.
TNA SUCKS !!!!!!!!!!!!!! SO U SUCK THAT
Sorry, but TNA’s debut on Monday did worse ratings than their regular show on Thrusdays.
I will admit TNA has a lot of great talent… but the fact that there is this amazingly huge division between it’s midcard and main event is saddening. Just a month ago, the main event was Angle/Sting/AJ/Daniels/Joe/Foley…
But now we have added Anderson/RVD/Pope… and sorta crowded the main event scene enough that we’ve demoted Daniels again, and turned him into an X-Division jobber?
My biggest problem with TNA right now, though, is that Hogan takes up too much of the show. He opened every show since his debut with a 20-minute chatterbox segment (just like WWE does, except WWE gives that 20 minutes to different people), then throughout the entire program he’s getting his face into EVERYONE’S storylines… and when he’s not in the segments, Eric Bischoff is.
Maybe TNA will give WWE competition, but I highly doubt they’re going to truly beat the WWE. They jumped the gun, I think… they should have waited a bit.
First off, stop trying to cut promos on Yahoo Answers, you’re not a wrestler. (And if you were, that would make it more pathetic) I have been watching wrestling for over 20 years. I mean ALL wrestling. WWF/E, WCW, NWA, Global Wrestling, WCCW, AWA, pretty much if it was shown on tv, I would watch. That included, and still does, TNA. TNA used to be very awesome, because it was different. Six sided ring, young athletic stars, mixed with a few bigger former WWE names, and inventive matches. For a few years back in 2006-2008, the action in the ring blew away WWE. However, they apparently decided that to beat WWE, they would have to copy WWE. So, they kept bringing in old WWE guys, or relased WWE guys. Everything that made them unique, slowly started getting less important. Awesome talents like Samoa Joe, Kaz, AJ, Daniels, The Machine Guns, Petey Williams, etc. became less important. Now, Hogan just sealed it. I’m not saying WWE is spectacular by any means, but be an alternative to WWE, not a inferior copy of WWE attitude era.
Ok let’s compare them
Old Farts>>Ric Flair,Hulk Hogan,Mick Foley,Scott Steiner and not to mention Sting
In WWE>>Triple H,HBK(million times better than anyone listed here) and Undertaker,somewhat Bret Hart if he returns after one night stand at WM 26….so which one is better
Not saying WWE is better but I can also tell you this TNA isnt that “Good”either,I mean they are about to change AJ Styles gimmick and let him follow the gimmick of Ric..seriously AJ was so awful during his promos that it made me throw..even hoes besides him where making strange faces and condolence for changing the gimmick of Abyss from monster to a joker just like Hoggie fart…and what to say the 10 second victory of RVD over Sting I mean RVD squashing a legend like Sting in just 10 seconds what a disgrace…TNA was better than WWE before the arrival of Hulk Hogan,its started to feel more like WWE day by day..
If someone likes awful RAW let him watch dont act like a P.R.O of TNA here..